The DJGPP compiler emits many warnings for conflicts between print
format specifiers and argument types. To fix the warnings, I added
`SDL_PRIx32` macros for use with `Sint32` and `Uint32` types. The macros
alias those found in <inttypes.h> or fallback to a reasonable default.
As an alternative, print arguments could be cast to plain old integers.
I opted slightly for the current solution as it felt more technically correct,
despite making the format strings more verbose.
This adds SDL_SetWindowKeyboardGrab(), SDL_GetWindowKeyboardGrab(),
SDL_SetWindowMouseGrab(), SDL_GetWindowMouseGrab(), and new
SDL_WINDOW_KEYBOARD_GRABBED flag. It also updates the test harness to exercise
this functionality and makes a minor fix to X11 that I missed in
https://hg.libsdl.org/SDL/rev/02a2d609369b
To fit in with this new support, SDL_WINDOW_INPUT_CAPTURE has been renamed to
SDL_WINDOW_MOUSE_CAPTURE with the old name remaining as an alias for backwards
compatibility with older code.
The warnings were produced by GCC 9.2.x for x86_64-linux-gnu or
i386-pc-msdosdjgpp targets.
Most of the fixes involve changing the type of a variable rather than
the format specifier. For many of the affected test conuter variables,
a basic int seems sufficient.
Some format specifier warnings still remain for cases where changing
type or casting seemed inappropriate. Those warnings will probably
require some new format specifier macros (e.g. SDL_PRIu32).
midwan
When trying to compile on a Raspberry Pi 3, running Raspbian Stretch (fully updated), a warning appears:
/home/pi/projects/SDL/src/test/SDL_test_memory.c: In function ?SDL_TrackAllocation?:
/home/pi/projects/SDL/src/test/SDL_test_memory.c:112:109: warning: format ?%llx? expects argument of type ?long long unsigned int?, but argument 5 has type ?unw_word_t {aka unsigned int}? [-Wformat=]
snprintf(entry->stack_names[stack_index], sizeof(entry->stack_names[stack_index]), "%s+0x%llx", sym, offset);
First: disable d'n'd events by default; most apps don't need these at all, and
if an app doesn't explicitly handle these, each drop on the window will cause
a memory leak if the events are enabled. This follows the guidelines we have
for SDL_TEXTINPUT events already.
Second: when events are enabled or disabled, signal the video layer, as it
might be able to inform the OS, causing UI changes or optimizations (for
example, dropping a file icon on a Cocoa app that isn't accepting drops will
cause macOS to show a rejection animation instead of the drop operation just
vanishing into the ether, X11 might show a different cursor when dragging
onto an accepting window, etc).
Third: fill in the drop event details in the test library and enable the
events in testwm.c for making sure this all works as expected.
SDL_ExitProcess(), SDL_AbortAssertion() and SDLTest_BailOut().
(Commit 303c1e0fb0cf for bug #4100 removed SDL_NORETURN from
SDL_ExitProcess() and SDL_AbortAssertion() in order to avoid
warnings from windows builds, but that's temporary I guess..)
Simon Hug
These are the remaining compiler warnings I see in the current tip cb049cae7c3c.
- SDL_test_log.c defines _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS without checking if it was already set.
- SDL_windowskeyboard.c converts integers to pointers without going over the (U)INT_PTR types. That bothers MSVC.
Eric Wasylishen
Alt-Up/Down/Left/Right switches between displays using SDL_WINDOWPOS_CENTERED_DISPLAY
Shift-Up/Down/Left/Right shifts the window by 100px
